In recent times, judicial activists have advanced persuasive arguments in favour of strengthening the Court of Appeal—a position that has garnered notable support from several nominees to the Supreme Court during their vetting. As the court of last resort for many Ghanaians, enhancing the capacity and authority of the Court of Appeal is a laudable objective particularly as a means of reducing the caseload burden on the Supreme Court.
However, I contend that such proposals must be grounded in empirical evidence rather than theoretical assertions. To assess the practicality and efficacy of strengthening the Court of Appeal, it is imperative to conduct rigorous research into the number of appeal cases that have been overturned by the Supreme Court since the inception of the 1992 Constitution. If statistical data and legal analysis reveal that the majority of decisions from the Court of Appeal are upheld at the Supreme Court, then it would be reasonable to consider designating the Court of Appeal as the final appellate forum in certain cases. In that case, Article 136(2) of the Constitution could be amended to require a panel of five (5) Justices—rather than three (3)—to hear such matters, thereby enhancing the court’s capacity for finality. Conversely, if the data shows a significant rate of reversal by the Supreme Court, the current appellate structure should be maintained.
Illustrative of this issue is the case of Ogyeedom Obranu Kwasi Atta v Ghana Telecommunication Co. Ltd, Suit No. J8/37/2021, which involved the admission of fresh evidence on appeal. This case exemplifies how matters lost at the Court of Appeal may still reach the Supreme Court, not merely for correction but to enrich Ghana’s legal jurisprudence. If the majority of cases reaching the apex court are indeed overturned, assigning finality to the Court of Appeal may result in unjust outcomes and hinder legal development.
Furthermore, under Section 16 of the Representation of the People Law, 1992 (PNDCL 284), the High Court is conferred with original jurisdiction to determine parliamentary election disputes. Per Article 99(2) of the 1992 Constitution, appeals from such matters are intended to terminate at the Court of Appeal. Yet, in practice, these cases frequently find their way to the Supreme Court through judicial review. Notable examples include Sumaila Bielbiel v Adamu Dramani & Attorney General and Michael Ankomah Nimfah v James Gyakye Quayson. These instances suggest that even constitutionally final appellate decisions are often revisited, raising critical questions about the real finality of litigation in Ghana’s legal system.
The oft-quoted maxim that “litigation must come to an end” must not be invoked as a mere rhetorical device; rather, it must be given meaningful application. The path to ensuring that lies in empirical inquiry and data-driven reform.
Ultimately, by anchoring our debates and proposals in factual analysis and measurable outcomes, we can make informed and effective decisions about the role, structure, and authority of the Court of Appeal. Only then can reforms truly serve the ends of justice and the long-term integrity of Ghana’s judicial system.
By Goodnuff Appiah Larbi
Legal Researcher
