The Basic Education Certificate Examination (BECE) was established under Ghana’s 1987 educational reforms as the bridge between Junior Secondary School (now Junior High School) and both Senior Secondary and TVET institutions.
First administered in 1990, it originally served two key functions: to certify completion of basic education and to place students into appropriate secondary-level programs.
Over the years, however, the BECE’s role has shifted. Today, it primarily determines placement, as most public and private employers seldom use BECE results in recruitment.
Critics argue that the exam’s stanine grading system, focused on norm-referenced ranking rather than absolute performance, can yield artificially constrained grade distributions and mask individual achievement.
The recent introduction of Free Senior High School (SHS) eliminated the historic cutoff points, and the rollout of the National Standardised Test (NST) has further blurred the BECE’s placement function.
Under the original National Pre-Tertiary Assessment Framework, the NST was intended to generate longitudinal performance data for each learner at Basic 2, 4, 6, and 8. Such data would have created robust profiles to guide students’ educational trajectories. In practice, however, the NST has not fulfilled this vision.
Given these developments, and the broader goal of ensuring an unobstructed path from basic to secondary education, it is timely to reconsider the BECE’s purpose within Ghana’s pre-tertiary system.
As the National Education Forum has presented its work, it will be interesting to know their recommendations on the BECE’s future. It is important for stakeholders to continue to weigh whether the exam still advances our educational objectives or whether a more effective assessment model should replace it.
I wish all current BECE candidates the very best in their examinations.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
