Across Africa, and particularly in Ghana, land is more than just a piece of earth — it is legacy, power, culture, and survival. It determines who eats, who builds, and who belongs. Yet, the institutions responsible for resolving land issues — especially the courts — are increasingly under fire for incompetence, corruption, and decisions that defy logic and justice.
Concerns Over Judicial Integrity in Land Disputes
In recent years, there has been growing concern about the credibility and competence of some judgments delivered in land dispute cases. These concerns raise fundamental questions: Do some judges fully understand the historical, legal, and customary complexities of the land cases before them? Are they adequately trained in both statutory and customary land law? Or is there a deeper, more troubling problem — one involving bribery, bias, and the intentional delivery of compromised rulings?
In many communities, public perception reflects a disturbing pattern. There are rulings that appear completely detached from facts and tradition, ignoring long-established customary interests or mysteriously favoring political elites and the wealthy. When judgments are delivered in the absence of legal coherence or historical understanding, justice is not merely delayed — it is sold.
As I have written elsewhere:
“A courtroom without integrity is more dangerous than a street without law.”
Case in Point: Nii Aryeetey v. Nii Otintor & Ors [2010]
One illustrative case is Nii Aryeetey v. Nii Otintor & Ors (2010), where the Supreme Court of Ghana had to reverse multiple contradictory lower court decisions in a long-standing Ga land dispute. Despite clear evidence of traditional ownership, lower courts delivered inconsistent rulings — raising questions about the influence, capacity, or impartiality of the judges involved. This case became a symbol of how dangerous poor adjudication in land matters can be — legally, socially, and economically.
When Courts Legitimize Injustice
There have been multiple outcries regarding judgments that:
Validate forged documents. Override family or stool ownership without proper customary consultation. Are handed down suspiciously fast — amid rumors of bribes or political pressure.
In the words of the late Justice Kpegah, a renowned Ghanaian jurist:
“When the bench becomes a marketplace, the gavel loses its voice.”
When courts become battlegrounds for private interest rather than forums of justice, entire communities suffer. Lineages lose ancestral lands. Youth inherit legal confusion. And investors lose trust in the system.
Land Disputes as a Barrier to Development
Beyond the courtroom, unresolved land disputes have massive developmental consequences. In short, Africa cannot build a prosperous future on a broken foundation. These disputes:
Scare off potential investors. Stall infrastructure and housing projects. Cause rural-urban migration due to insecurity and eviction fears. Breed local conflicts, violence, and intergenerational poverty.
Rather than being a springboard for development, land becomes a battlefield of litigation, frustration, and loss.
Judicial Reference: Adjetey v. Nmai (1972) 2 GLR 123
In this landmark Ghanaian case, the court warned of the dangers of double sales and undefined land boundaries:
“Where there is a failure to establish clear boundaries of ownership, the court becomes a battleground of contradictions, leading not to resolution but to further social fragmentation.”
This judgment highlights a central point: when courts are overwhelmed by unclear documentation, poor record-keeping, or manipulated claims, their failure ripples outward into society, crippling trust and peace.
Global View: World Bank’s Position on African Land Governance
A recent 2022 World Bank report on land governance in Africa made a stark observation:
“Africa’s land governance systems remain the biggest obstacle to agricultural and infrastructural transformation. Without secure land rights, the continent’s potential remains a dream deferred.”
In simple terms, development cannot happen where land rights are unstable, court judgments are unpredictable, and corruption eats away at justice.
The Way Forward: Reform, Integrity, and Innovation
To reverse this tragic pattern, Africa must embark on a holistic reform of its judicial handling of land matters. This includes:
Specialized training for judges in land tenure systems — both customary and statutory. Transparent case tracking and digitization of land records. Community consultation in customary land disputes. Severe penalties for judicial misconduct and corruption in land-related cases.
Above all, we must remind ourselves that land is not just a legal issue — it is a human, spiritual, and economic right. A single compromised ruling can destroy families, derail progress, and deepen distrust in institutions meant to protect the people.
Final Reflection
Africa’s land is her most valuable resource. But when the courts become unreliable stewards, and the disputes they preside over go unresolved or are manipulated, the continent remains trapped. If we do not secure land with justice, we cannot secure our future with dignity.
Let the gavel rise again — not for sale, but for truth.
[email protected]
